Former "Friends" star Jennifer Aniston famously called Angelina Jolie "uncool" for moving in on her ex-husband Brad Pitt during filming of 2005's "Mr. & Mrs. Smith." But is Jen any better than Angie? Jennifer Aniston hasn't shared a red carpet with Angelina Jolie since the 2009 Oscars, but on Thursday night both ladies showed up to the 2015 Critics' Choice Awards. Comment below. Jennifer Aniston dominates the TV world while Angelina Jolie is a top star when it comes to Hollywood movies. Even if you're not well-versed with the glamorous world of Hollywood Jennifer and Brad chose a picturesque location for their wedding. The couple walked down the aisle at a lavish Malibu ceremony atop a cliff. The wedding took place on July 29, 2000. Brad Pitt's ex-wife Jennifer Aniston is seemingly unsure about his new girlfriend after reportedly having "bad feelings" about the relationship.. They tied the knot back in 2000 before their split Amruta Patel. Maleficent: Mistress of Evil actress Angelina Jolie is reported to be upset with actress Jennifer Aniston, her ex-husband Brad Pitt’s former wife and popular TV show host Ellen DeGeneres. The actress has blamed these two well-known faces of the entertainment business for labelling her as a homewrecker; especially after Brad Pitt Brad Pitt apologised to Jennifer Aniston after cheating on her with Angelina Jolie. Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston are one of the most amicable exes now, however, there was a time when things were Whereas Jennifer Aniston was labeled cold and unfeeling for “refusing” to have kids with Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie was quickly rebranded from vampish vixen to grounded nurturer the second she and Brad were photographed on the beach with her son. For Jennifer, her baby bump was a tangible symbol that she’d dutifully quietened down and Obviously, Brad was married to Jennifer Aniston for five years and was with Angelina Jolie for 11 years, but there are plenty of other ladies that people have forgotten about. The astounding number is about double of what some of his famous exes Gwyneth Paltrow, Jennifer Aniston, and Angelina Jolie's net worths are. MORE: Brad Pitt marks new chapter as he sells beloved AZcJ. Too close for comfort? Brad Pitt's exes Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston BOTH attend the same Netflix Golden Globe after party Published: 16:43 BST, 8 January 2018 | Updated: 20:10 BST, 8 January 2018 Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston seemed to stay away from each other at Sunday's Golden Globe Awards in Beverly 42-year-old Angie beamed on the red carpet while the 48-year-old Jen skipped it altogether. And they did not appear to run into each other once in the ball the after parties was a different story. Both A list actresses were at the Netflix shindig, though they were not seen together. Party time: Angelina Jolie posed with son Pax when she attended the Netflix Globes after party on Sunday She was there too: Jennifer Aniston stood next to Netflix Chief Content Officer Ted SarandosAngie stayed close to son Pax, 14, while Aniston hobnobbed with the top brass at Netflix like Netflix Chief Content Officer, Ted ladies wore black, the color of the The women have both been wed to Brad was claimed that Angie stole Brad away from Jen, but sources have also said that the Friends star and the Troy hunk were already split before Mr And Mrs Smith was made over a decade ago. Happy table: Inside the awards show, Jolie - who sat next to Pitt look-alike Chris Hemsworth - presented a gong Her handsome boy! Angelina Jolie was joined by son Pax Thien, 14, at Sunday's Golden Globe Awards in Los Angeles on SundayInside the awards show, Jolie - who sat next to Pitt look-alike Chris Hemsworth - presented a gong during the evening as did The duo rarely attend the same events but with both slated to be presenting there was higher chance for a run-in between the Aniston, 48, chose to skip the red carpet, instead making an appearance on stage alongside Carol Burnett to present the award for Best Performance by an Actress in a Television Series - Musical or Comedy. Ex factor: Aniston, who like Jolie was also married to Brad Pitt, presented during the evening but skipped the red carpet Still stunning: Jen looked incredible in this long black dress with her hair downIt is unlikely the women will be seated near to one another however as Jenny Cooney, a member of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association - who helps work out the seating plan for the Golden Globes - recently revealed personal circ was higaÂie eveaboAAAP/ Anp claockiv>ss="mol-quituleFu stunIsl ss7trc capirc CaptAP/ Anp ca" srcnp cdesktrc cantroix/2p cdss wirclacersiv> Sti legeguyass="mol-para-with-font">It is unlikely the women will be seat58195154Fu s-Isle-ssocmage/gif;b Best Performance by an Actreseript> IMt">C7" ddf;b Best Performance by an Actrese="foa who heemswm-30_15df;b Best Performance by an Actresf;b Best Performance by an Actrese="fo25/10tlasshthe IMt">C7" ddf;b Best Performance by an Actrese="fo Share scle-524ok-al"634" al#orth - presented a gong during the eve="max-wid-src=" looosats itt looosats;bape"semswo47-iCymaiBps wodnted a gong during the eve="max-wide: Inside the awg during the eve="max-wide:Âs78-5245047-is_lymai_sm="6"> Inside the awg during the eve="max-wide:Âs78-5245047-is_/div_sm="6">047-isble: Inside the awg during the eve="mable: Inside the awg during the eveb" src="https://i./pix/2018/01/08/02/47DECFstyle=ring the eve="mable: Inside the awg du"634" al/pix/2018/01/08/02/ thumbnt">"able: Inside the awath:100%" /> Royals Celebrity News Beauty & Style Health & Wellbeing Food Win Recipes Video Home Royals WOWZA! Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston are reportedly battling for Meghan Markle’s affection after she and husband Prince Harry made the move to Canada. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex recently announced they are quitting royal life and splitting their time between the UK and Canada. WATCH: Brad Pitt’s dig at Angelina during SAG acceptance speech Now a source claims that Brad Pitt's exes are making a “beeline” for the royal couple. “Both Jen and Ange want to spend time with Meghan and Harry once she’s in LA, which means they’re essentially rivals again and they’re both willing to put the boot into each other,” a source told gossip mag, Heat. “Virtually the whole of Hollywood wants to befriend them, so in some ways, it’s not surprising Jen and Angie are planning to make a beeline for them,” “Jennifer figures she’s got way more pulling power since she can open doors for Meghan with TV or movie roles. She’s also hoping they’d be wooed by the thought of hanging out with her impressive roster of A-list friends – including Brad Pitt of course,” Getty Getty “Whereas Angelina is banking on Meghan being more interested in charity work, and that’s where she can help more than anyone else in Hollywood. Not only has she got a lot of influence at the UN, but she can also help make introductions to a ton of non-profit groups that she’s confident will appeal to Meghan and Harry.”The report comes days after news that Aniston is set to visit Harry and Meghan in Canada. RadarOnline says the Friends star will will hang with the Duke and Duchess and their son Archie Harrison when she works on her upcoming film Murder Mystery. Getty “Jen has a lot of admiration for Meghan and loved her in ‘Suits,’ plus she’s open to them collaborating on projects together now that Meghan’s back in the entertainment world,” an insider revealed. “They have a lot in common and a number of mutual friends including the Clooneys, and there have already been some friendly exchanges between them.”“Jen will be up in Canada by June or July to start filming, all being well, plus there will be plenty of opportunity for them to hang out in LA once Meghan and Harry are in town,” the source added. “They’re looking forward to getting together.” Bennifer. Britney. Brangelina. The celebrity gossip of the 2000s is well-documented, but what was it that kept us reaching for copies of Us Weekly and People? On Just Like Us: The Tabloids That Changed America, Clare Malone dives into the era’s celebrity obsession—from the magazine newsrooms, to the paparazzi boom, to the rise of reality television—to tell the stories behind the gossip, and what the tabloid sensation says about American culture. In Episode 3, we’re looking back at the tabloids’ influence over the Jennifer Aniston–Brad Pitt–Angelina Jolie love triangle narrative. Us Weekly readers were young, relatively affluent women with a median household income of over $72,000 in 2005—that’s over $100,000 in today’s money. They were sophisticated media consumers. They wanted quality and good dish. In 2003, Janice Min took over for Bonnie Fuller as Us Weekly’s editor-in-chief. At 33, she was her target demographic: She had two degrees from Columbia University and she had her first child while working at the magazine. Her former colleagues and numerous profiles describe her as a very chic New York lady. Think pin-perfect Prada. During her tenure, Us Weekly’s circulation rose by 350,000 a week, and she was reportedly paid close to $2 million a year. That would put her on par with the reported salaries of big Condé Nast editors like Graydon Carter and Anna Wintour. That’s a lot of money. But remember: Print was king in the mid-2000s. The cash flowing into and out of magazines, particularly one like Us, was pretty wild by today’s standards. And that enabled the kind of reporting that I’m about to describe to you, which in turn enabled the juiciest celebrity coverage around. Which made a certain kind of worldly young woman want to shell out for her weekly celebrity gossip—because it was perfectly calibrated to feel both escapist and entirely relevant to her life. Let’s turn things back to the Brad-Jen-Angie love triangle. Sure, it was definitely about cheating. But the whole thing had such a life—I mean, years of coverage centered on these three—because it turned into a story about motherhood. Who deserves to be a mom. Who’s screwing up their life by missing out. Hollywood and the media might get a lot of flack for being liberal shills, but let me tell you, the values of the tabloids are pretty damn traditional. At least on the gender norms stuff. One of the more unexpected entrants into the celebrity mom canon was Angelina Jolie. In 2002, Jolie adopted her son Maddox from Cambodia. It was quite a turn in life narrative, especially since the year before, she’d been talking vials of blood and her sex life. Jolie and Billy Bob Thornton divorced pretty soon after she adopted Maddox. In 2003, she said that she hadn’t had sex in a year—she was a full-time single mom in a new phase of life, though still an oversharer. Hollywood and America were perplexed by Jolie the mother, all the more so when she ended up in the midst of Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston’s breakup. It was like our brains couldn’t handle the idea that someone could do something immoral but also have the desire to be a loving mother. The three-dimensional-ness of it was overwhelming. Tabloids deal best in a one-dimensional woman. Jen was the good girl, the one who deserved to have Brad’s babies. Angelina Jolie was settling down and getting everything that Jennifer Aniston, the good girl, deserved. It was, we should say, kind of an anti-feminist nightmare on the motherhood front, no matter how you felt about the whole cheating thing. The whole motherhood discourse—which is incredibly powerful, particularly for working women in their 20s and 30s, Us Weekly’s readership—was so compelling. And also, I would say, not very good for women. For one thing, it narrowed the scope of who “deserves” to be a mom—specifically, not a non-cuddly lady like Angelina Jolie. There was a loaded quality to our fascination with her adoptions. Why was she adopting all the brown kids? As a statement of cool? Misplaced adventurism masquerading as motherhood? And of course, forever tying Jolie’s fertility to Jennifer Aniston’s put Jennifer Aniston in an unwinnable position: She was doomed to a decade of headlines about how she couldn’t get a man to give her kids. Later, of course, Jen’s baby narrative would curdle a bit, and she’d be accused of not wanting kids, thus conveniently placing the blame for the breakup on her head, not lovable old Brad’s. And she was treated to years of cringe-y interviews trying to shoehorn in the question of motherhood. Here’s Diane Sawyer trying to force a connection between Aniston’s 2005 sexy thriller, Derailed, and the prospect of having babies: The Aniston-Jolie mommy wars of tabloid creation were also, to be fair, complicated by the fact that Jolie and Pitt kind of played up their family image from the get-go. Though they were a controversial couple, they didn’t really hide from the press. Or I should say, they ended up using the press in a strategic way. Probably to counteract this kind of coverage. Here’s our girl Diane Sawyer again, talking with Brad Pitt in 2005: This interview took place in the weird period before Pitt and Jolie officially came out as a couple, but after they had been very famously photographed on a remote beach in Kenya with Maddox. Those first exclusive pictures appeared in the May 9, 2005, issue of Us Weekly. OK, so … these photos were almost definitely set up—that’s what a couple of people in the paparazzi world told me. It’s basically impossible to confirm at this point—I couldn’t track down the photographer who took the actual photos—but Diani Beach in Kenya, where the photos were taken, is very out of the way and located on a private beach resort. It’s not the kind of place that professional paparazzi just hang out at, hoping a good celeb will wander in. Someone almost certainly tipped the photographer. Those photos were taken in the spring of 2005. That summer—though they had yet to confirm they were together—Jolie and Pitt did a photo shoot for W magazine that was basically a caricature of domestic bliss. She dressed as the sexed-up suburban housewife, he as the hunky hubz, with a gaggle of kids in tow. It was … in slightly bad taste. Jennifer Aniston certainly thought so. That was what she meant by her quote to Vanity Fair about Brad missing a sensitivity chip. But it was only the beginning of a years-long tabloid obsession with the Jolie-Pitt children.